BUT since it was PROVEN that this guy had no credibility, had no bond with the animals, and was being PAID to testify, that apparently equals RACKETEERING..........why???
HSUS/ASPCA and the others did NOT have to pay out millions but could have gone to trial on the racketeering charges. Of course, they did not, because we all know they paid the guy to pretend and then testify for them. Since he did a piss poor job of testifying and was found completely not credible, how in the world could the AR groups--who had PAID him to testify-- absolve themselves against RICO charges??? They could not, did not, and the AR groups paid, paid paid to get out of the case. Amazingly, no one was arrested. The circus, after wasting 14+ years on this crap, decided to phase out the elephants acts in the circus rather than to find themselves in yet another 14 year long case because we all know, AR activists never, never, never stop. JIHADIST is how they are.
https://youtu.be/4hN0ai9WzBQ
---- HSUS WAYNE PACELLE USES TOKEN BLACK
NFL CONVICTED DOG FIGHTER, MICHAEL VICK, TORTURER + KILLER OF ANIMALS (pitbulls) ---
TO SPREAD HSUS PROPAGANDA, THEN CLAIMS VICK WOULD BE A GOOD PET OWNER................
AFTER HSUS GOT A NEW LAW IN CALIFORNIA WHICH STATES, ANIMAL CONTROL CAN TAKE YOUR ANIMALS EVEN IF YOU ARE NOT CONVICTED OF ABUSE, EVEN IF YOU HAVE NO TRIAL, EVEN IF YOU WERE ACQUITTED---AND EVEN IF IT'S 6MO. BEFORE YOUR "ABUSE" TRIAL.................[usually AR groups get AC to file such a forfeiture motion early in the game. We have seen such motions fail in CA.]
Now why would Vick go and pimp himself off for HSUS? HSUS claims they want no animals abused, no animals tortured, HSUS outlawed dog fighting in the USA-- but then uses a convicted dog fighter to pimp off HSUS by sending Vick to poor neighborhoods, mostly black neighborhoods? REALLY?? Would you take a rapist to teach kids not to rape others?
Would you take a parent who abused kids repeatedly, went to PRISON and then USE that person to teach kids not to abuse other kids??? OR-----even worse---- is it OK to do it because you are only bringing Vick to the black neighborhoods?????? Get the Drift???
Humane Society CEO Wayne Pacelle Loves This Dogfighter
http://www.humanewatch.org/humane-society-ceo-wayne-pacelle-loves-this-dogfighter/
One of the problems with animal welfare policy—and public policy in general—is that demagogues on one side or another of a political issue make sleazy and unsupported attacks on the other. One of the scummier instances of this we’ve seen was during the 2012 election, when the lobbying arm of the misnamed Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) ran ads implying that Congressman Steve King of Iowa supported dogfighting.
A number of TV stations refused to run the ads, recognizing this HSUS bile for what it was. Essentially, King had wondered about whether it was worth passing a federal anti-dogfighting law when dogfighting is already illegal in all 50 states. But a question about state-vs.-federal resources gave HSUS the opportunity it needed to nip at his heels, even though King publicly clarified that yes, he is against dogfighting like every other sane person.
Unfortunately lies and rumors don’t die easily on the Internet, and last week a petition popped up slamming King for this (years-old) episode and closely tracking HSUS’s rhetoric. So far it has nearly 30,000 signatures.
It’s a good opportunity, then, to remind the public that HSUS CEO Wayne Pacelle has helped more dogfighters than Congressman Steve King (who, like most people, has helped zero).
Pacelle developed a bro-mance with convicted dogfighting kingpin Michael Vick following Vick’s release from prison. After Vick got out of the slammer, Pacelle and HSUS rehabilitated Vick’s public image. Vick controversially signed with the Philadelphia Eagles to resume his NFL career, and—coincidentally, perhaps—the Eagles gave a $50,000 grant to HSUS.
If that’s not nauseating enough, Pacelle later told the media that Vick “would do a good job as a pet owner.” Vick has since gotten a dog.
Disturbingly, there was also a significant increase in dogfighting in Pennsylvania following Vick’s hookup with Pacelle and HSUS. According to the Pennsylvania SPCA, in 2008, while Vick was still in prison, there were 237 investigations of animal fighting in the state. In 2010, there were 1,177—an increase of 400 percent. According to the Pennsylvania SPCA, this uptick in investigations included “an increase in actual dogfighting.”
Pacelle’s alliance with a convicted dogfighter sure seems to have produced a lot of other Vick-tims. And as for the dogs Vick helped abuse? Pacelle recommended back in 2007, when Vick was indicted, that they be killed. Many or most are now rehabilitated and in caring homes.
Wayne Pacelle likes to claim he speaks on behalf of animals. If the dogs could talk, they might tell Pacelle they don’t want him. It could be deadly.
Posted on 05/28/2015 at 12:12 pm by Humane Watch Team.
WHO ARE WE KIDDING HERE? NEVER, NEVER, NEVER DONATE TO HSUS, PETA, OR ANIMAL RIGHTS GROUPS THAT TAKE YOUR MONEY .......and then help devise laws against owning animals, pets, livestock, and more. If you didn't understand the connection you need to be more informed. Animal Rights' GOAL --- is to eliminate ownership of animals and all commercial use of animals, animal products, including hunting, fishing, livestock (Animal Rights, aka "AR" are strictly vegan; we have nothing against vegan, but should be a choice, not forced...)
Further, ARs exist mainly to (a) make a lot of $$ and (b) to simply worship animals as children, in case you didn't realize it; and under Satanic law, only the killing of animals and children is wrong; the killing of anything else is not considered wrong. Go look it up. It's not just on Wiki, it is verified world wide. Last but not least, it appears that those who consider themselves worshipping or following Satan principles/ideas, are usually atheists. Never Christians.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Satanic_Bible
http://theisticsatanism.com/politics/animal-sacr.html (below shows excerpts from...)
..."[U]nder NO circumstances would a Satanist sacrifice an animal or baby! For centuries, propagandists of the right hand path have been prattling over the supposed sacrifices of small children and voluptuous maidens at the hands of diabolists. It would be thought that anyone reading or hearing of these heinous accounts would immediately question their authenticity, taking into account the biased sources of the stories. On the contrary, as with all "holy" lies which are accepted without reservation, this assumed modus operandi of the Satanist persists to this day!"
"There are sound and logical reasons why the Satanists could not perform such sacrifices. Man, the animal, is the godhead to the Satanist. The purest form of carnal existence reposes in the bodies of animals and human children who have not grown old enough to deny themselves their natural desires. They can perceive things that the average adult human can never hope to. Therefore, the Satanist holds these beings in a sacred regard, knowing that he can learn much from these natural magicians of the world."
( From The Satanic Bible, 1969, Avon Paperback, pp. 87 to 89, in the context of a chapter which okays limited "human sacrifice" in the sense of curses, but not in the sense of actual physical murder.)
"Unfortunately, LaVey's comments imply that if you do practice animal sacrifice, you should do so in a deliberately cruel manner, to maximize the animal's "death throes."
But this is not the traditional idea at all, in religions and magical traditions that practice animal sacrifice, including traditional ideas on demon evocation. In traditional grimoires such as the Key of Solomon and the Grimorium Verum, the animal is supposed to be killed in a relatively humane manner, such as by cutting off its head with only one blow. Why? Because, traditionally, animal sacrifice is about blood, not "death throes." Therefore, even if you do practice animal sacrifice, there is still no excuse for cruelty to the animal..."
Note: To be clear, the author of the Satanic info--the 2 paragraphs directly preceeding-- is stating that a Satanist (who followed satanic rules) would not normally kill a child or animal..even if this was true, by claiming that children/animals are not to be killed, but killing adults and anything else is not a sin, it is apparent that the killing "OK" by satanic law only has 2 exceptions. Whereas in the Ten Commandments, thou shall not kill is basically limited to people, not just kids. If you know anything at all about the 10 Commandments, then look at the Satanic laws and you can see the Satanic stuff is simply the direct opposite of the 10 Commandments.
Note: To be clear, the author of the Satanic info--the 2 paragraphs directly preceeding-- is stating that a Satanist (who followed satanic rules) would not normally kill a child or animal..even if this was true, by claiming that children/animals are not to be killed, but killing adults and anything else is not a sin, it is apparent that the killing "OK" by satanic law only has 2 exceptions. Whereas in the Ten Commandments, thou shall not kill is basically limited to people, not just kids. If you know anything at all about the 10 Commandments, then look at the Satanic laws and you can see the Satanic stuff is simply the direct opposite of the 10 Commandments.
https://youtu.be/aNOSeVamf20 EXCELLENT VIDEO SHOWING CAPTIVE BRED BIRDS THAT HSUS WANTS TO ELIMINATE.........FOR THAT MATTER, HSUS APPROACHES CONGRESS YEARLY, TO TRY AND ELIMINATE ANY "NON INDIGENOUS" PET OR ANIMALS, INCLUDING TROPICAL FISH, BIRDS, SNAKES, REPTILES,LIVESTOCK, CHICKENS, ETC. INCLUDING HORSES................and of course, eliminating such animals would eliminate the breeding of same. This includes BREEDS of DOGS and CATS that did not ORIGINATE in the USA.
Which is WHY they want them eliminated, so no one can sell, breed, use, advertise, barter, buy, trade, or otherwise obtain the species, the babies from such species, and then it would be illegal to
possess the same.................................
(HSUS has been known to say that snakes and other reptiles get into fresh water lakes and blah blah blah; but what they don't tell you is that HSUS does not want any species sold, including all fish other than maybe goldfish; all birds from the tropics; everywhere we research, HSUS is in the schools telling kids via propaganda, improper facts about animals. HSUS provides through their vast subsidiaries, education materials to elementary school kids. and as for "microchips" HSUS likely has invested in that when they first came out... )
How do we know any of this? Because Research proves it. HSUS' site used to have over 4,000 pages and HSUS was courting churches (so they would get their members to donate), schools, kids under 10 yr old, and actually telling them what to do. Such as how to fink off your neighbor.
https://youtu.be/6OsaH0iN6UM
THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT HSUS
Know this: HSUS has and is responsible for the majority of
STATE laws that have/are passed which affect animal owners
Many of the laws were enacted POST Katrina, when HSUS was UNABLE
to account for many millions of $$$$ they raised from Katrina, when thousands
of people gave $$$ to help save animals?
HSUS took credit all right, but then
why can't they tell people where the $$$$ Millions all went?
Bring in $34million, can only account for $7 million?? Hello?!?
After Investigation by the Government, LA decided HSUS could just fund some
"shelters" over a few years and never mind about the missing $$$$?
The missing millions was far more than it cost to build the shelters, we are
pretty sure..........................
Another Video re HSUS...........What HSUS is doing!
7 Things You Didn’t Know About HSUS
1) The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) is a “humane society” in name only. It isn’t affiliated with any hands-on “humane society” organizations, and it doesn’t operate a single pet shelter or pet adoption facility anywhere. During 2008, HSUS contributed barely $450,000— less than one-half of one percent of its budget—in grants to dog and cat shelters.
By comparison, that same year it gave $2.25 million to a political campaign committee behind an anti-meat ballot initiative in California, and put $2.5 million into HSUS’s executive pension plan. HSUS is the wealthiest animal-rights lobbying organization on earth. It agitates for the same goals as PETA and other radical groups, but uses fewer naked interns.
2) Beginning on the day of NFL quarterback Michael Vick’s 2007 dogfighting indictment, HSUS raised money online with the false promise that it would “care for the dogs seized in the Michael Vick case.”
The New York Times later reported that HSUS wasn’t caring for Vick’s dogs at all. And HSUS President Wayne Pacelle told the Times that his group urged government officials to “put down” (that is, kill) the dogs rather than adopt them out to suitable homes. HSUS later quietly altered its Internet fundraising pitch. Vick now gives HSUS “sponsored” speeches. And most of his dogs have been rehabilitated—without any help from HSUS.
3) HSUS’s senior management includes a former spokesman for the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), a criminal group designated as “terrorists” by the FBI. HSUS president Wayne Pacelle hired John “J.P.” Goodwin in 1997, the same year Goodwin described himself as “spokesperson for the ALF” while he fielded media calls in the wake of an ALF arson attack at a California veal processing plant.
In 1997, when asked by reporters for a reaction to an ALF arson fire at a farmer’s feed co-op in Utah (which nearly killed a family sleeping on the premises), Goodwin replied, “We’re ecstatic.” That same year, Goodwin was arrested at a UC Davis protest celebrating the 10-year anniversary of an ALF arson at the university that caused $5 million in damage.
4) A 2008 Los Angeles Times investigation found that HSUS receives less than 12 percent of the money raised on its behalf by California telemarketers. Professional fundraisers keep the rest. If you exclude two campaigns run for HSUS by the “Builda-Bear Workshop” retail chain—which consisted of the sale of surplus stuffed animals (not really “fundraising”)—HSUS’s yield shrinks to just three percent. This is typical. In 2004, HSUS ran a telemarketing campaign in Connecticut with fundraisers who promised a return of “zero percent” of the proceeds. The campaign raised over $1.4 million. Not only did none of that money go to HSUS, but the group paid $175,000 for the telemarketing work. Similar filings exist in Massachusetts, New York, and other states. In 2008 HSUS collected more than $86 million in contributions, but spent more than $24 million on fundraising.
5) HSUS’s heavily promoted U.S. “boycott” of Canadian seafood—announced in 2005 as a protest against Canada’s annual seal hunt—is a phony exercise in media manipulation. A 2006 investigation found that 78 percent of the restaurants and seafood distributors described by HSUS as “boycotters” weren’t participating at all.
Nearly two-thirds of them told surveyors they were completely unaware HSUS was using their names in connection with an international boycott campaign.
Canada’s federal government is on record about this deception, saying: “Some animal rights groups have been misleading the public for years … it’s no surprise at all that the richest of them would mislead the public with a phony seafood boycott.” A documentary director also caught an HSUS film crew abusing a dying seal while they shot a 2007 fundraising video on the ice floes of Atlantic Canada.
6) HSUS raised $34 million in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, supposedly to help reunite lost pets with their owners. But comparatively little of that money was spent for its intended purpose.
Louisiana’s Attorney General shuttered his 18-month-long investigation into where most of these millions went, shortly after HSUS announced its plan to contribute $600,000 toward the construction of an animal shelter on the grounds of a state prison. In 2009, Atlanta ABC affiliate WSB-TV reported that public disclosures of the disposition of the $34 million in Katrina-related donations added up to less than $7 million.
7) After gathering undercover video footage of improper animal handling at a Chino, CA slaughterhouse during November of 2007, HSUS sat on its video evidence for three months, even refusing to share it with the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
HSUS’s Dr. Michael Greger may have perjured himself before Congress, testifying that the San Bernardino County (CA) District Attorney’s office asked the group “to hold on to the information while they completed their investigation.” The District Attorney’s office quickly denied that account, declaring that HSUS refused to make its undercover spy available to investigators if the USDA were present.
Ultimately, HSUS chose to release its video footage at a politically opportune time, as it prepared to launch a livestock-related ballot campaign in California. Meanwhile, meat from the slaughterhouse continued to flow into the U.S. food supply for months.
Get our updates in your email box! Sign up below
Categories:
Animal Rights
Animal Rights
No comments:
Post a Comment